Friday, September 4, 2020
Natural POLICY AND GOVERNANCE - Essay Example This outcomes in authoritative governmental issues which might be positive or negative for the organization relying upon the aim of those wading into controversy. Some play a reasonable game and to support the association while others wade into controversy to accomplish individual closures. The inquiry that asks answers in this manner, is; is it conceivable or attractive to dispense with authoritative legislative issues? In this exposition, I will contend that it is beyond the realm of imagination to expect to wipe out hierarchical governmental issues as long as there are assets to be shared and it isn't even attractive to do as such as it underpins organization development. Hierarchical legislative issues is characterized by Griffin and Moorhead (2013: 387) as Ã¢â¬Å"the exercises completed by individuals to procure, upgrade and use power and different assets to acquire wanted results in a circumstance where there is vulnerability or disagreement.Ã¢â¬ Power is exceptionally fundamental in associations as it figures out who gets what, when and how and as such it isn't unordinary to discover representatives particularly directors battling for power in order to pick up control (Gilmore and Williams 2013: 80). Some of the time power is accomplished by the insignificant reality of a people position in the association (authentic, coercive and reward power) henceforth people with great influence utilize all way to hold it or increase it by rising to a place of power. This involves participating in political conduct to accomplish such closures particularly on the off chance that they feel their position is compromised. This political conduct (Cavanaugh, Mobe rg and Velasques 1981: 368) can be utilized for moral or dishonest purposes and ought to be dodged on the off chance that it doesn't regard the privileges of every single influenced party, doesn't regard standards of equity and doesn't prompt productive improvement of fulfillment of interests inside and outside association. In spite of the fact that it might be unscrupulous, Griffin and Moorhead (2013: 388) contend that attempting to dispose of political conduct will only from time to time, if at any point, work. Rather, this may build the conduct due to coming about vulnerability and uncertainty. They contend that governmental issues may give conceivable
Posted by Donnie Owens at 3:38 AM
Monday, August 24, 2020
Anti-microbials And Children A significant issue concerning the offspring of today is the overabundance endorsing of anti-toxins and the risks that are being made. Regular, an ever increasing number of youngsters are being endorsed any simple answer for an intense issue. There is a steady push from pharmaceutical organizations, guardians, and gigantic showcasing organizations to attempt the following anti-microbial cure, yet as we look towards the future and the illnesses that can be made by this convenient solution, we should direct to our concentration toward choices cures. What is so horrendous about this circumstance is that the most dire outcome imaginable of the impacts of the mass portions of anti-toxins they ingest is an untreatable bacterium that is resistant to the medicines we know about. That may not sound so terrible until you consider the quantity of youngsters around the globe that could kick the bucket from this bacterium. It would most certainly be a disastrous occasion if a segment of the world's populace at that ahead of schedule of an age were to be eradicated. It would be a human-actuated bubonic plague of the twenty-first century and it is truly not that a long way from turning into a reality. In an examination done in 1992, there were more than sixty million diverse oral anti-microbial remedies were providing for individuals younger than fifteen years of age (Napoli). The breadth of anti-microbial choices combined with their boundless use in pediatric patients feature the significance of drug specialists having an intensive commonality with pediatric anti-toxin treatment. Likewise, issues may emerge in rewarding kids younger than two in view of their juvenile resistant framework, absence of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) endorsement for pediatric utilization of numerous anti-infection agents and restricted information supporting treatment courses of under ten days (Napoli). Additionally, an additional complexity of the treatment of the patient is the eagerness, capacity to follow the routine, and the comprehension of the significance of finishing the treatment. Prior to filling the medicine for the fitting prescription, doctors should know about basic pediatric diseases and their suggested anti-microbial treatment. It is essential to recall that most upper respiratory diseases are viral and that anti-toxins would be pointless in the endeavor to treat such a contamination (Berger). This will just reinforce the opposition of bacterial pathogens, restricting the adequacy of the accessible anti-toxin medicines. Regular pediatric contaminations incorporate otitis media (OM), skin and skin-structure diseases, pharyngitis, bronchitis and urinary tract contaminations (UTIs) (Napoli). Most anti-infection solutions that are given every year go to kids younger than six. This is likewise the age bunch that is generally powerless to the high-opposition strain of microscopic organisms (Drugs and Biotech). As of late, microbes that ordinarily contaminate kids and grown-ups (like streptococcus pneumonia and staph) have gotten logically impervious to anti-infection agents (Napoli). Far reaching, unpredictable utilization of anti-toxins has made exceptionally safe microscopic organisms. A few kids who could typically be treated with a solitary course of anti-infection agents must be treated with at least two courses. Some who could have been recently rewarded with an oral anti-toxin at home currently must be admitted to clinics and rewarded with intravenous anti-infection agents (More Drugs ?). Diseases with anti-microbial safe microscopic organisms are substantially more typical in high salary, white, rural youngsters younger than 6, who have gotten an anti-toxin over the most recent three months and go to childcare (More Drugs ?). These youngsters are considerably more liable to visit their primary care physician and are at more serious danger of accepting an anti-infection than populaces that are therapeutically underserved (Drugs and Biotech). As expressed previously, anti-toxins are compelling just in bacterial diseases and not in viral contaminations. On the off chance that you take one hundred youngsters with a fever, on normal ninety of them will have a viral disease and ten of them a bacterial one (Berger). Shockingly, anti-toxins will never really diminish the indications or to hurry the goals of the viral diseases. The issue could be effortlessly illuminated if the specialists would simply disclose this to the guardians as opposed to letting them push for an ever increasing number of anti-microbials (More Drugs ?). Indeed, examines show that specialists are bound to recommend an anti-toxin when the parent pushes for that tranquilize. Guardians, then again, state that specialists are not setting aside the effort to clarify when youngsters
Posted by Donnie Owens at 3:08 AM
Saturday, August 22, 2020
The Assassination of Malcolm X Subsequent to going through a year as a pursued man, Malcolm X was shot and executed during a gathering of the Organization of Afro-American Unity (OAAU) at the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem, New York, on February 21, 1965. The aggressors, in any event three in number, were individuals from the dark Muslim gathering the Nation of Islam, the gathering with which Malcolm X had been an unmistakable priest for a long time before he split with them in March 1964. Precisely who shot Malcolm X has been fervently bantered throughout the decades. One man, Talmage Hayer, was captured at the scene and was unquestionably a shooter. Two other men were captured and condemned yet were in all probability wrongly denounced. The disarray over the personality of the shooters aggravates the topic of why Malcolm X was killed and has prompted a wide scope of fear inspired notions. Turning out to be Malcolm X Malcolm X was conceived Malcolm Little in 1925. After his dad was mercilessly killed, his home life unwound and he was before long selling drugs and engaged with insignificant violations. In 1946, 20-year-old Malcolm X was captured and condemned to ten years in jail. It was in jail that Malcolm X found out about the Nation of Islam (NOI) and started composing day by day letters to the NOIÃ¢â¬â¢s pioneer, Elijah Muhammad, known as the Ã¢â¬Å"Messenger of Allah.Ã¢â¬ Malcolm X, the name he gained from the NOI, was discharged from jail in 1952. He immediately ascended the positions of the NOI, turning into the clergyman of the huge Temple Number Seven in Harlem. For a long time, Malcolm X stayed an unmistakable, candid individual from the NOI, making contention the country over with his talk. Be that as it may, the nearby ties between Malcolm X and Muhammad started to whither in 1963. Breaking With the NOI Strains immediately raised between Malcolm X and Muhammad, with the last fracture happening on December 4, 1963. The whole country was grieving the ongoing passing of President John F. Kennedy when Malcolm X openly offered the tactless comment that JFKÃ¢â¬â¢s passing was as Ã¢â¬Å"chickens returning home to roost.Ã¢â¬ accordingly, Muhammad requested Malcolm X to be suspended from the NOI for 90 days. After the finish of the suspension, on March 8, 1964, Malcolm X officially left the NOI. Malcolm X had gotten disappointed with the NOI thus after he left, he made his own dark Muslim gathering, the Organization of Afro-American Unity (OAAU). Muhammad and the remainder of the NOI siblings were not satisfied that Malcolm X had made what they saw as a contending association an association that might pull an enormous gathering of individuals from the NOI. Malcolm X additionally had been a confided in individual from the inward hover of the NOI and knew numerous privileged insights that might crush the NOI whenever uncovered to general society. The entirety of this made Malcolm X a risky man. To ruin Malcolm X, Muhammad and the NOI started a slanderous attack against Malcolm X, considering him the Ã¢â¬Å"chief hypocrite.Ã¢â¬ To safeguard himself, Malcolm X uncovered data about MuhammadÃ¢â¬â¢s acts of unfaithfulness with six of his secretaries, with whom he had ill-conceived kids. Malcolm X had trusted this disclosure would make the NOI ease off; rather, it simply caused him to appear to be considerably progressively hazardous. A Hunted Man Articles in the NOIÃ¢â¬â¢s paper, Muhammad Speaks, turned out to be progressively horrendous. In December 1964, one article got near calling for Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s death, Just the individuals who wish to be directed to heck, or to their fate, will follow Malcolm. The pass on is set, and Malcolm will not get away, particularly after such malicious, stupid discussion about his advocate [Elijah Muhammad] in attempting to deny him of the perfect wonder which Allah has offered to him. Such a man as Malcolm is deserving of death, and would have met with death on the off chance that it had not been for MuhammadÃ¢â¬â¢s trust in Allah for triumph over the foes. Numerous individuals from the NOI accepted the message was clear: Malcolm X must be slaughtered. During the year after Malcolm X had left the NOI, there had been a few death endeavors on his life, in New York, Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles. On February 14, 1965, only seven days before his death, obscure attackers firebombed Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s house while he and his family were sleeping inside. Fortunately, all had the option to get away from safe. These assaults made it self-evident Malcolm X was a pursued man. It was wearing him out. As he disclosed to Alex Haley only days before his death, Ã¢â¬Å"Haley, my nerves are shot, my brainÃ¢â¬â¢s tired.Ã¢â¬ The Assassination On the morning of Sunday, February 21, 1965, Malcolm X woke up in his twelfth floor lodging at the Hilton Hotel in New York. Around 1 p.m., he settled up with the lodging and set out toward the Audubon Ballroom, where he was to talk at a gathering of his OAAU. He stopped his blue Oldsmobile about 20 streets away, which appears to be astounding for somebody who was being pursued. At the point when he showed up at the Audubon Ballroom, he headed behind the stage. He was pushed and it was starting to appear. He lashed out at a few people, yelling furiously. This was bizarre for him. At the point when the OAAU meeting was to begin, Benjamin Goodman went out in front of an audience to talk first. He was to represent about a thirty minutes, heating up the horde of around 400 preceding Malcolm X was to talk. At that point it was Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s turn. He ventured up to the stage and remained behind a wooden platform. After he gave the customary Muslim welcome, Ã¢â¬Å"As-salaam alaikum,Ã¢â¬ and got the reaction, a frenzy started in the group. A man had stood up, yelling that a man close to him had attempted to pick-pocket him. Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s protectors left the stage region to go manage the circumstance. This left Malcolm unprotected on the stage. Malcolm X avoided away from the platform, saying Ã¢â¬Å"LetÃ¢â¬â¢s be cool, brothers.Ã¢â¬ It was then that a man stood up close to the front of the group, pulled out a sawed-off shotgun from underneath his channel coat and shot at Malcolm X. The impact from the shotgun made Malcolm X fall in reverse, over certain seats. The man with the shotgun discharged once more. At that point, two other men hurried the stage, discharging a Luger and a .45 programmed gun at Malcolm X, hitting for the most part his legs. The clamor from the shots, the savagery that had recently been submitted, and a smoke bomb that had been set off in the back, all additional to the confusion. As once huge mob, the crowd attempted to get away. The professional killers utilized this disarray to further their potential benefit as they mixed into the group everything except one got away. The person who didn't escape was Talmage Ã¢â¬Å"TommyÃ¢â¬ Hayer (here and there called Hagan). Hayer had been shot in the leg by one of Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s guardians as he was attempting to get away. Once outside, the group understood that Hayer was one of the men who had quite recently killed Malcolm X and the horde began to assault Hayer. Fortunately, a police officer happened to stroll by, spared Hayer, and figured out how to get him into the rear of a squad car. During the commotion, a few of Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s companions hurried to the phase to attempt to support him. Regardless of their endeavors, Malcolm X was excessively far gone. Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s spouse, Betty Shabazz, had been in the live with their four girls that day. She approached her better half, yelling, Ã¢â¬Å"They are slaughtering my husband!Ã¢â¬ Malcolm X was put on a cot and conveyed over the road to the Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center. Specialists attempted to restore Malcolm X by opening up his chest and rubbing his heart, yet their endeavor was ineffective. The Funeral Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s body was cleaned, made respectable, and wearing a suit with the goal that the general population could see his remaining parts at the Unity Funeral Home in Harlem. From Monday through Friday (February 22 to 26), long queues of individuals held back to get a last look at the fallen pioneer. Notwithstanding the various bomb dangers that every now and again shut down the review, roughly 30,000 individuals endured. At the point when the survey was finished, Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s garments were changed into the conventional, Islamic, white cover. The burial service was hung on Saturday, February 27 at the Faith Temple Church of God, where Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s companion, on-screen character Ossie Davis, gave the commendation. At that point Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s body was taken to the Ferncliff Cemetery, where he was covered under his Islamic name, El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. The Trial The open needed Malcolm XÃ¢â¬â¢s professional killers got and the police conveyed. Tommy Hayer was clearly the first captured and there was solid proof against him. He had been arrested at the scene, a .45 cartridge was found in his pocket, and his unique mark was found on the smoke bomb. The police discovered two different suspects by capturing men who had been associated with another shooting of a NOI ex-part. The issue was that there was no physical proof tying these two men, Thomas 15X Johnson and Norman 3X Butler, to the death. The police had just observers that dubiously recollected that them being there. Notwithstanding the frail proof against Johnson and Butler, the preliminary of every one of the three litigants started on January 25, 1966. With the proof mounting against him, Hayer stood up on February 28 and expressed that Johnson and Butler were guiltless. This disclosure stunned everybody in the court and it was muddled at the time whether the two truly were blameless or whether Hayer was simply attempting to get his co-plotters free. With Hayer reluctant to uncover the names of the genuine professional killers, the jury at last accepted the last hypothesis. Each of the three men were seen as blameworthy of first-degree murder on March 10, Ã¢â¬â¹1966, and were condemned to life in jail. Who Really Killed Malcolm X? The preliminary did little to explain what truly occurred in the Audubon Ballroom that day. Nor did it uncover
Posted by Donnie Owens at 9:44 PM
Incongruity in Ã¢â¬Å"The Cask of AmontilladoÃ¢â¬ In the short story, Ã¢â¬Å"The Cask of AmontilladoÃ¢â¬ by Edgar Allan Poe, Poe utilizes two sorts of incongruity, sensational and verbal. Emotional incongruity is the point at which the peruser sees something that a character in the story doesn't. Poe utilizes this sort of incongruity in the character Fortunato. Verbal incongruity is the point at which the character says a certain something and means something different. This kind of incongruity can be perceived in the explanations that the characters, Fortunato and Montresor, state to each other. The name of the character, Fortunato holds emotional incongruity inside itself. The name Fortunato takes after the word blessed. In this story, the character Fortunato is definitely not lucky. Toward the start, Fortunato accepts that he is blessed to have a companion, Montresor, who accepts to have discovered a funnel of Amontillado. In any case, at long last Fortunato discovers that he has been deceived and is covered alive. Another unexpected element about the character Fortunato, is how he is depicted to be dressed, similar to a court entertainer. The timespan in which The Cask of Amontillado happens, court entertainers are viewed as boneheads. All through the story, Fortunato is tricked to trust MontesorÃ¢â¬â¢s guarantee of the Amontillado. When Montresor binds Fortunato to the divider the explanation that he says, makes Fortunato resemble a numb-skull. Ã¢â¬Å"Ã¢â¬â¢ Pass your hand over the divider; you can't resist feeling the nitre. To be sure, it is VERY clammy. Again, let me IMPLORE you to return. No? At that point I should decidedly leave you. In any case, ...
Posted by Donnie Owens at 12:23 AM
Friday, August 21, 2020
African American Writers The African-American Community has been honored with a large number of researchers. Two of those researchers incorporate Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du bois. Both of these men, had a dream for African-Americans. They needed to see the progression of their race of individuals. These extraordinary pioneers simply had unique perspectives with regards to how this ought to be practiced. Mr. Washington's perspectives depend on his very own understanding and comprehension of legislative issues. Mr. Du bois' perspectives originated from his insight into the significance of instruction and its capacity to separate hindrances of shading. Washington and Du bois needed to see the headway of the African-American individuals. The inquiry was The secret might they be able to progress? There is a twelve-year age distinction among the two respectable men. I could see the distinction that 10 years could make in the outlooks of the two respectable men. Washington is the senior of the two. He was separated of the subjection framework not just a result of it. He was a slave who was liberated. A man without neither a history, nor a last name to consider his own. Du bois was naturally introduced to an arrangement of opportunity. He never experienced having an ace or the absence of opportunity to move about however he wanted. He appeared on the scene and saw issues. He didn't see the long way that had been headed out to come to the heart of the matter that they were at as of now. In this manner these men saw various methods of achieving their objectives as a race. In Booker T. Washington's collection of memoirs Up From Slavery , he imparts to the peruser a bounty of data with regards to how he turned into the man he was. He was conceived on a manor in Franklin County, Virginia. At the soonest snapshots of his life, he was a worker, cleaning the yards, conveying water, and taking corn to the plants. Booker T. Washington discusses the weight of opportunity. He discusses the perspectives of the slaves towards their lords after liberation. At the point when the slaves learned they were free there was an inclination of fervor, trailed by one of the truth that they were currently answerable for accommodating their families, cover, food, apparel and a superior lifestyle. He discusses the association and bond that they kept on sharing, as the slaves started to flourish and the ace and his family started to endure. Washington recalls his new life in West Virginia. The part where is instruction was set aside for later because of a need of salary to help his family. Be that as it may, he likewise recalls his will and assurance to increase training at any expense. This brought about him going to class around evening time and voyaging a few miles so as to increase legitimate instruction. Washington in the long run increased an instruction at Hampton University, and proceeded to educate. He was likewise head of Tuskegee University. Mr. Washington's beneficial experience's instructed him that everything has a period and a spot. He portrayed a kid in a grimy live with torn and worn out garments, perusing a French book. He accepted that man must have abilities and ought to have the option to accommodate himself and his family. He was discussing monetary opportunity. He was talking about working with white individuals, to attempt to improve a spot for the two races. From various perspectives, I think he felt it was increasingly essential to have food on your table as opposed to books in your grasp. Mr. Washington realized that all together for African-Americans to flourish, whites would must be included. All together for a man to get up off the ground he should first persuade the man holding him down to take his foot off his throat. Mr. W.E.B. Du bois was in reality a researcher and progressive. He was conceived in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. He was an alum of Fisk University and the primary Black to get a doctoral qualification from Harvard University. Du Bois' investigation into the chronicled and sociological states of dark Americans made him the most persuasive dark scholarly of his time. His book The Souls of Black Folk written in 1903 is an incredible assortment of papers, in which Du Bois portrays the endeavors of African-Americans to accommodate their African legacy with their pride in being U.S. residents. In this book he additionally fought that Washington's push for African-Americans to give up political quality and the mission for social equality briefly for the structure of riches wasn't right. Du bois accepted that he
Posted by Donnie Owens at 7:26 PM
Thursday, July 16, 2020
Inscriptions Boon or Blot I love to shop for used books. One of my favorite finds in the last couple of years was copies of Ex Libris and Rereadings by Anne Fadiman, together in one store. Id been looking for both books for some time, always finding a lone copy of Ex Libris, but never Rereadings. I like things to match, so it became this absurd quest to find both books at the same used bookstore (I know now theres a third book in this beautiful little trio, but at the time I missed the memo). The day I found both books together was a day for celebration. I bought both, triumphantly, and then proceeded to not read them. Last week, after writing about memoirs about books, I pulled my copy of Ex Libris off the shelf to finally, finally read. When I opened it I noticed, for the first time, the inscription written on the dedication page in purple ink: June, 2003 Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper or your confidence. Robert Frost Kim Thanks for a great school year! M.H. What are the chances of finding a book with an inscription to a person with my own name? Id guess not high, but Im a reader, not a statistician. Coincidentally (or, perhaps not), Fadiman has an essay in Ex Libris about inscriptions in books Words on a Flyleaf. For Fadiman (and myself), inscriptions can be a blessing or a curse: Unlike the card that accompanies, say, a sweater, from which it is soon likely to part, a book and its inscription are permanently wedded. This can be either a boon or a blot. On the plus side, coming across an inscription either in a book I received as a gift or one I plucked randomly off the shelf at a used bookstore always makes me smile. Particularly if they are, like the inscription I found in Ex Libris, heartfelt and slightly verbose. I always wonder who the writer and receiver were. It seems clear that Kim was a teacher or administrator, but who is M.H.? A fellow teacher? A student? A friend who spent the year listening to Kim complain or exclaim about her students? Its hard to know, but you have to admire M.H. for quoting Robert Frost. Yet despite how much I love finding inscriptions, I never write them in the books I give. Im a notorious book pusher at holidays, but writing an inscription seems presumptuous. Its not my place to write on the pages of someone elses book before they get the chance to read it. Plus, what if its a book theyve already read? A book they dont want to read? A book they want to pass on to someone else? How will they return or exchange or pass on that book if Ive already scribbled on the first page? More importantly, an inscription gives a book weight entirely outside how the reader will feel after reading it. A book suddenly has meaning above and beyond, I think youd really like this story. It has significance tied to a date or time or relationship that makes the book hard to part with whether you want to keep it or not. I dont want to put that sort of pressure into the gift of a book. After all, how would M.H. feel if he/she knew Kim gave away the copy of Ex Libris that he/she bought and signed? If that Kim were me, Id hate to find out.
Posted by Donnie Owens at 7:20 PM
Thursday, June 25, 2020
Should Wealthy Nations Be Required To Share Their Wealth Among Poorer Nations? (Essay Sample) Content: Running Head : Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among 1.poorer nations?Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations?Students NameInstitutional AffiliationDateShould wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations? 2The wealthy nation should share their wealth among poorer nations due to the following reasons:Poor nations are behind in development: many poor nations are behind in development activities and programs because of lack of resources for development. Therefore, wealthy nations that are developed should share their wealth to developing or poor nations so that they can be able to develop. Wealth shared involves money resources, material resources and human resources which are the key pillars of development, therefore when these resources are shared by poor countries they to boost them and develop in different aspects such as education sector, health sector, agricultural sec tor, banking sector, mining sector among other development sectors.Sharing of resources also leads to the partnership between and among nations. In the process of sharing of resources partnership among nations sharing the resources emerges which fosters national agenda of development among individual nations. This partnership may extent making poor countries and come to the same level as the wealthy nations (Goldthau, 2017).Sharing of wealth between wealthy and poor nations leads to financial, social and cultural ties between and among nations. Through sharing of wealthy, nations tend to coordinate each other in other categories of life leading to diversity in terms of culture, social and economic development and adaptability. These ties lead uniformity in social development, cultural development, and economic development in countries coordinating which leads to the development of poor nations.Sharing of wealth also leads into sharing of technology and other current issues in the sc ope. Wealthy countries tend to have new and improved technologies which foster development in their countries. In the process of sharing of wealth poor countries tend to have access to the new technologies which foster development in poor countries. Technology in money sector, computer technology, reading and study technology, employment technology, technology in the agriculture sector, food technology and power technology among other technologies lead to development when they are well introduced in a country and utilized accordingly.On the other hand, Wealthy nations shouldn't share the wealth with poor countries because of the following:Sharing of wealth to poor countries leads to dependence. When nations are supported with handouts in terms of foodstuffs and other non-development helps it leads overdependence on developed nations leading to poor or no developments in developing nations. For instance, many, developing countries in Western Sahara tend to over-depend on developed c ountries making the developing or poor nations to stagnate in development agendas.Leads to development stagnation: development in poor countries may remain stagnant due to being provided every...
Posted by Donnie Owens at 2:43 AM